|

Plane | The open source alternative to Jira


Plane
Plane

Introduction

Plane is an open-source project management tool designed to provide a simple, extensible, and customizable platform for managing issues, sprints, and product roadmaps. It aims to be a developer-friendly alternative to tools like Jira, offering a more flexible and transparent solution for software development teams.

Use Cases

  • Issue Tracking
    Managing and tracking software bugs, feature requests, and other tasks throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Sprint Planning
    Planning and organizing work into sprints, assigning tasks to team members, and tracking progress towards sprint goals.
  • Product Roadmap
    Visualizing and communicating the product’s future direction, including planned features and timelines.
  • Collaboration
    Enabling team members to collaborate effectively on tasks and projects through comments, notifications, and real-time updates.
  • Custom Workflow Management
    Tailoring the workflow to match your team’s specific processes and requirements using customizable states and transitions.

Features & Benefits

  • Issue Management
    Create, assign, and track issues with detailed descriptions, priority levels, and custom fields.
  • Sprint Management
    Plan and manage sprints with drag-and-drop functionality, set sprint goals, and monitor progress.
  • Roadmap Planning
    Visualize your product roadmap with timelines, milestones, and dependencies to communicate your strategy effectively.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Define custom states and transitions to tailor the workflow to your team’s specific processes.
  • Integrations
    Integrate with other development tools like GitHub, GitLab, and Slack to streamline your workflow and keep everyone informed.

Pros

  • Open Source
    Offers transparency, customization, and community support.
  • Developer-Friendly
    Designed with developers in mind, providing a flexible and extensible platform.
  • Customizable
    Allows tailoring workflows and fields to match specific team needs.
  • Cost-Effective
    Potentially lower costs compared to proprietary solutions, especially with self-hosting options.

Cons

  • Self-Hosting Complexity
    Self-hosting may require technical expertise and resources.
  • Limited Integrations (Compared to established tools)
    The number of integrations may be smaller than more established project management solutions.
  • Newer Platform
    As a newer platform, it may lack some of the features and maturity of older tools.

Tutorial

None

Pricing